Scala is advertised as the successor to Java by some and as an experimental ground for new features by others. According to its creator, Martin Odersky, it is supposed to be the swiss army knife of programming languages, something that is a scripting language and yet still offers all that Java has and more. When saying that it is a scripting language, it is referencing the usual characteristics of these languages which is dynamic typing and low verbosity (Scala is NOT dynamically typed, it does type inference which in practice means that you rarely have to declare the type of your variables.). It is very difficult at this point to determine if Scala is going to be widely used, so why should you use time on Scala? Why not Groovy or Ruby? The two latter languages are definitely worth looking at, however they truly are scripting languages and most of their popularity is not so much due to the language itself, but more due to their application in Rails frameworks. If you are already familiar with scripting languages, then these languages have very few new features but mostly polished versions of existing concepts (Ruby is as old as Java, so very few things are actually new in Ruby). Scala on the other side has a number of features that are bit more original or at least cutting edge, so even if Scala doesn’t make it as a mainstream language a lot of the features in the languages are likely to appear in whichever language makes it. So why not get a heads start? Now, I am in no way a language expert, I am practitioner not a theorist, but this is the general feeling I get from the people I talk to and the what I read around the net.
So where should you start? To understand the why of Scala and the principles it was built on, I can recommend the presentation that Martin Odersky gave at JavaOne. Audio and the slides can be found at the Sun Developer Network here (subscription required). I was at the session and I can testify that looking around the room there were quite a few of the big shots of the Java world attending (such as Joshua Bloch and Brian Goetz). A light introduction aimed at Java developers called Scala for the Java Refugee, I found very useful to get a quick start with a mapping from Java concepts to Scala concepts. After that you can move to the more Scala specific features that are appropriately presented in the Scala tutorials from the official site. I found the tutorials very concise and a good introduction to all the major concepts of Scala. As for books, there is only one I know off at this point and it is the Programming in Scala book. It is due out at the end of July, but you can already get a PDF version and preorder the book. I've heard positive things about it and I have preordered the paper version.
So after reading all this, what next? Well as for everything else in computer science, you have to start coding. Starting up is fairly easy, you can follow the documentation on the official site, and you should be compiling and running in no time. There are Ant and Maven targets available so integrating it into an existing project is fairly easy. As for which IDE to use, I've tried Netbeans, Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA. They all have Scala plugins, at more or less advanced stages. Although I am a big IDEA fan, the Eclipse plugin is for now doing the best job, although it is by no mean very stable. I am, however, going to keep a close eye on IDEA 8 and the Scala plugin that is scheduled to come out shortly after. Scala is completely compatible with existing Java libraries, so you won't have to reinvent the wheel for every part of your program. This goes for all libraries and not just the trivial ones, I've successfully used Scala with Hibernate for example. You should have no problem running inside an application server either. Therefore, there is no reason to start from scratch with Scala, you can just take a component of your application and implement it with Scala, and keep the rest of your existing code.
Personally, I have implemented an Applet using Scala and I found the language very pleasant once you get used to the syntax. You can do some things very efficiently, and I find that the language is generally very readable. Java is definitely very verbose compared to Scala, and I found that having no checked exceptions and closures really make the code focus on the "what" of the program and much less on the "how". The use of Actors for Swing, is also very interesting and made for some really readable event driven code. I can warmly recommend that you give this a shot, if only to get a perspective on different programming constructs.
